19 April 2024

Governor Calls for Changes to Religious-Freedom Bill

#
Share This Story

Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson on Wednesday called for changes to a religious-freedom bill passed by the state’s legislature, after it sparked an outcry akin to the one that followed a similar law in Indiana from groups and companies who say it could be used to discriminate against gays and lesbians.

Mr. Hutchinson, a Republican, asked lawmakers to recall the bill at a news conference Wednesday morning, saying that its language must make clear that it isn’t the intent of Arkansas to discriminate. The bill’s supporters in the state House rebuffed a move by other lawmakers to amend the bill before passing it Tuesday, saying that the discrimination issue should be addressed elsewhere.

In Indiana, widespread criticism over the religious-freedom law, including calls for a boycott of the state, spurred GOP Gov. Mike Pence on Tuesday to call for an amendment clarifying that the law wouldn’t permit businesses to deny service to gays and lesbians.

The Arkansas bill, which protects individuals and companies from state and local laws that infringe on their religious rights, was approved by a sizable majority of legislators. But a number of large companies—including Arkansas’ largest private employer, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., and Apple Inc.—oppose it, saying it would result in discrimination. Wal-Mart Chief Executive Doug McMillon asked Gov. Hutchinson to veto the bill in a statement released Tuesday on Twitter.

The mayor of the state’s capital, Little Rock, and the Little Rock Regional Chamber of Commerce, have come out against the bill as well, saying it would be bad for business. Supporters of the bill say it is necessary to ensure that the government doesn’t infringe upon citizens’ religious rights, adding that its intent isn’t to discriminate against gays and lesbians.

The Arkansas measure, like Indiana’s law, is wider in scope than similar legislation passed in other states and at the federal level, legal experts say. That is because it broadly defines the exercise of religion as any action or refusal to act “substantially motivated by a person’s sincerely held religious beliefs,” regardless of whether those beliefs are central to the religion in question.

It also allows those who claim to have been grieved to sue any entity under the law, even if that entity isn’t a part of government. The law doesn’t apply to employees seeking to file a lawsuit against private employers or the state’s corrections system.

Click here to access the full article on The Wall Street Journal. 

Join Our Online Community
Be part of the USDJ movement to grow the middle class. Connect with others, track relevant news and blogs, and make a difference!
US Daily Journal Social News
Follow Us