26 April 2024

Measuring 'Unemployed' Is a Moving Target

#
Share This Story

"When more and more people are thrown out of work, unemployment results." Calvin Coolidge's quote about joblessness was probably one time he would have been better off living up to his nickname, "Silent Cal." Fast forward 80 years, and the former president would have a tougher time mastering the obvious. Nowadays, unemployment is a fuzzy concept that can be measured in more or less flattering ways.

Friday's release of November jobs data, the first since the election, may involve less acrimony than recent ones. But it may be more significant. With the Federal Reserve weighing a target for ending extraordinary stimulus based on unemployment, expect debate on how to interpret the rate.

It likely stayed at 7.9% in November, according to economists. While unchanged from the previous month, that level would be tied for the second-lowest reading since January 2009.

The Fed has made clear, though, that isn't good enough. And it may target what seems like a low unemployment rate, suggesting at least a year more of bond buying. This is because a given level of unemployment today translates into less real wages per person available to be spent or taxed than it would have a few years ago.

The reason? The composition of those who are "employed" has changed. Consider the 4.4% trough in unemployment in March 2007. Back then, another measure of unemployment including "discouraged" workers was just 4.6%. An even broader gauge called the U6, which includes marginally employed people seeking full-time work, was 8%. Today those are 8.4% and 14.6%, respectively. So the "employed" aren't generating as much income as they used to.

Meanwhile, the size of the labor force hasn't kept up with the overall population. Retiring baby boomers have played a role, but mostly it is due to people going back to school, entering prison, becoming homemakers or claiming disability. Payrolls have expanded by an average of just 80,000 a month since the recession ended—less than population growth. And real disposable personal income per capita is flat.

No wonder the Fed is dissatisfied. While no one is thinking of a return to the trough rate, it may want to see what would once have been a fabulous level of unemployment to convince itself America is working.

Join Our Online Community
Be part of the USDJ movement to grow the middle class. Connect with others, track relevant news and blogs, and make a difference!
US Daily Journal Social News
Follow Us